Request for Feedback PR 186 on REP 145 Conventions for IMU Sensor Drivers

ROS ROS General
1

Hello Everyone,

We have a long standing REP proposal in #145 which remains in draft status:

There was a strong discussion several years ago which lead to the draft and a a few followups for review. However, the discussion petered out and I’d like to take a moment to ask that people provide their feedback on the REP in the current pull request to update the REP.

https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/rep/pull/186

It would be great to either finalize this, evolve it, or table it instead of leaving it languishing. So please take a moment and review it in the next couple of weeks.

2 Likes
2

Moved to the PR thread

Nothing to see here

3

Sorry I wasn’t clear. Please comment on the PR itself so we can keep the conversation local, especially if we want to do line by line comments etc.

1 Like
4

5

I remember taking part in those discussions starting in 2015. Thanks for bringing it up again, it’s been bothering me for years that it wasn’t ever finished!

1 Like
6

Here is one driver that I think should be made compliant to whatever REP 145 ends up being:

https://github.com/dawonn/vectornav

1 Like
7

This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.