🚀 [New Release] BUNKER PRO 2.0 – Reinforced Tracked Chassis for Extreme Terrain and Developer-Friendly Integration

Hello ROS community,

AgileX Robotics is excited to introduce the BUNKER PRO 2.0, a reinforced tracked chassis designed for demanding off-road conditions and versatile field robotics applications.

Key Features:

  • Christie suspension system + Matilda four-wheel independent balancing suspension provide excellent terrain adaptability and ride stability.
  • Easily crosses 30° slope terrain.
  • Maximum unloaded range: 20 km; maximum loaded range: 15 km.
  • Capable of crossing 40 cm trenches and clearing obstacles up to 180 mm in height.
  • IP67-rated enclosure ensures robust protection against dust, water, and mud.
  • Rated payload capacity: 120 kg, supporting a wide range of sensors, manipulators, and payloads.
  • Maximum speed at full load: 1.5 m/s.
  • Minimum turning radius: 67 cm.
  • Developer-ready interfaces and ROS compatibility.

Intelligent Expansion, Empowering the Future

  • Supports customizable advanced operation modes.
  • Communication via CAN bus protocol.
  • Open-source SDK and ROS packages for easy integration and development.

Typical Use Cases:

  • Outdoor Inspection & Patrol
  • Agricultural Transport
  • Engineering & Construction Operations
  • Specialized Robotics Applications

AgileX Robotics provides full ROS driver support and SDK documentation to accelerate your development process. We welcome collaboration opportunities and field testing partnerships with the community.

For detailed technical specifications or to discuss integration options, please contact us at sales@agilex.ai.

Learn more at https://global.agilex.ai/

A bit weird for a tank-like robot.

1 Like

Check out the BUNKER PRO 2.0 demo here:
:movie_camera: BUNKER PRO 2.0 Product Promo Video

This video showcases the BUNKER PRO 2.0, the reinforced tracked chassis designed for extreme terrain. It’s perfect for off-road conditions and developer-friendly integration. Don’t miss it!

Thanks for your comment! I understand your concern. For tracked robots, the turning radius is often misunderstood because it’s not just about the simple ‘turning’—it’s more about the space required for the robot to make a full in-place spin. In our case, the minimum width required for this spin is determined by the diagonal length of the tracks. That’s why 67 cm is actually a reasonable measurement for a robot of this type. Hope that clears things up!

1 Like