# ROS 2 Layer for OpenEmbedded Linux

**URL:** <https://discourse.openrobotics.org/t/ros-2-layer-for-openembedded-linux/2835>\
**Category:** OpenEmbedded\
**Created:** [October 4, 2017, 10:55am UTC](https://discourse.openrobotics.org/t/ros-2-layer-for-openembedded-linux/2835 "2017-10-04T10:55:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![esteve](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/user_avatar/discourse.openrobotics.org/esteve/32/12_2.png) [@esteve](https://discourse.openrobotics.org/u/esteve)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2017, 1:31pm UTC](https://discourse.openrobotics.org/t/ros-2-layer-for-openembedded-linux/2835/2 "2017-10-04T13:31:55Z")

</div>

This awesome! Any particular reason for choosing GPLv3 instead of MIT? Perhaps picking the latter would just make it easier to get it integrated into meta-ros (which is licensed as MIT, much like OpenEmbedded’s core recipes). Also, given that these are build recipes, maybe there’s not much of benefit in using GPLv3.

Thanks Victor (and Erle)!

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.openrobotics.org/t/ros-2-layer-for-openembedded-linux/2835)._