# Preparing for Indigo Sync 2017-08-09

**URL:** <https://discourse.openrobotics.org/t/preparing-for-indigo-sync-2017-08-09/2423>\
**Category:** Indigo\
**Created:** [August 10, 2017, 11:47pm UTC](https://discourse.openrobotics.org/t/preparing-for-indigo-sync-2017-08-09/2423 "2017-08-10T23:47:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tfoote](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/user_avatar/discourse.openrobotics.org/tfoote/32/3813_2.png) [@tfoote](https://discourse.openrobotics.org/u/tfoote)\
**Post date:** [August 10, 2017, 11:47pm UTC](https://discourse.openrobotics.org/t/preparing-for-indigo-sync-2017-08-09/2423/1 "2017-08-10T23:47:36Z")

</div>

We have over 100 packages ready for sync on indigo.

There’s one noted regression that rtabmap appears to be running out of memory on the Trusty armhf builds: [http://build.ros.org/view/Ibin\_arm\_uThf/job/Ibin\_arm\_uThf\_\_rtabmap\_ros\_\_ubuntu\_trusty\_armhf\_\_binary/](http://build.ros.org/view/Ibin_arm_uThf/job/Ibin_arm_uThf __rtabmap_ros__ ubuntu_trusty_armhf__binary/) I will try to get it a little bit more memory for the moment. But it’s been failing consistently recently: [Armhf indigo builds are failing due to running out of memory · Issue #195 · introlab/rtabmap\_ros · GitHub](https://github.com/introlab/rtabmap_ros/issues/195) @matlabbe

We’ve also identified tile\_map as a regression. It’s been ticketed at: [[tile\_map] Builds failing on ROS buildfarm · Issue #500 · swri-robotics/mapviz · GitHub](https://github.com/swri-robotics/mapviz/issues/500) @EVenator

If there’s anything else I should be aware of please reply here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tfoote](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/user_avatar/discourse.openrobotics.org/tfoote/32/3813_2.png) [@tfoote](https://discourse.openrobotics.org/u/tfoote)\
**Post date:** [August 11, 2017, 6:23pm UTC](https://discourse.openrobotics.org/t/preparing-for-indigo-sync-2017-08-09/2423/2 "2017-08-11T18:23:51Z")

</div>

Thanks @pjreed and @matlabbe for the quick responses. We have a clean status so I’m running the sync now.